top of page
Search

Dave Ramsey is Dead Wrong About Investing

Writer: Josh Tischler
Josh Tischler
Apr 16, 2018
4 min read


Dave Ramsey's program "Financial Peace University" came to my church recently. I'm thrilled my church was thinking about the financial health of the church members. I generally like and agree with the majority of the advice Dave Ramsey gives in the field of personal finance and combating debt. Dave has helped hundreds of thousands or even millions of people get serious about debt and excessive spending.


But what I don't like about Dave Ramsey's more popular programs can be boiled down into 3 main points:


1) Dave Ramsey broadcasts general advice to a large swath of people at different points on their financial journeys. Sometimes the general advice (such as don't use credit cards and never finance a vehicle purchase with a loan) is not appropriate given different financial situations.


2) Dave Ramsey charges an excessive amount for a program meant to help people get out of debt. I'm sure the return on investment is great, but in my personal opinion, $129 per kit is excessive for a financial program targeting church members with debt problems. Dave Ramsey could charge much less per kit and still make a healthy profit. It's a great business plan that makes him boatloads of cash, but the fact that he utilizes church's networks and resources to sell his products so that he can be a multi-millionaire sets off red flags and alarm bells with me. Perhaps I'm overly idealistic.


3) My last point, which is what this article is really about, is that Dave Ramsey recommends only actively managed mutual funds for investments. He explicitly does not recommend low-fee exchange traded funds, single stocks, certificates of deposit, bonds, annuities, or real estate investment trusts.

Some of the investments he mentions to avoid make sense. The absolute shocker is that Dave Ramsey explicitly does not recommend passive exchange traded funds or bonds. These are two of the most important types of investments for a properly diversified portfolio. Excluding these assets from your investment toolkit for life is like keeping a tool bag full of hammers. Maybe you ought to consider adding a few other things in there?


What's worse is he pushes actively managed funds as alternatives. He does this despite all of the research (which includes a nobel prize or two) and bets against statements made by some of the greatest investors the world has ever seen.


But don't just take my word for it.


Jim Cramer is the host of a show called Mad Money. He's not an investing genius, per se. More of an investing personality. Jim makes a living broadcasting his individual stock picks to millions of viewers each day. He also runs an actively managed charitable investment fund. Check out what Jim Cramer (who, again, makes his living by actively picking stocks for other people) says about actively managed funds:


What (active funds are) being paid to do is bring in more money from you, from more investors. That's part of the reason why in study after study, year after year, it's shown that the actively managed mutual funds underperform the benchmarks. - Jim Cramer

And then there's Warren Buffet. He also goes by "The Oracle of Omaha", a well-earned moniker for decades' worth of amazing business deals and open market stock picks. Warren Buffett is undoubtedly the most well-regarded and recognizeable names in investing today. Let's see what he thinks about actively managed funds:


When trillions of dollars are managed by Wall Streeters charging high fees, it will usually be the managers who reap outsized profits, not the clients. Both large and small investors should stick with low-cost index funds. - Warren Buffet

There are many other big investing names such as Jack Bogle out there who have worked to spread the word about the power of the amazing and yet unassuming low fee index fund.


So Why Does Dave Ramsey Back High-Fee Active Mutual Funds?


It might have something to do with the fact that Dave Ramsey collects a decent chunk of change referring listeners to his SmartVestor program, which is chock-full of advisors that invest heavily in high fee mutual funds. These advisors pay on the order of $400 to $900 per month to be on Dave's hallowed list. And why not? Association with conservative Christian Dave Ramsey has created an incredible amount of leads for these advisors and implies they can be trusted. The SmartVestor referral program even created enough of a stir that it was investigated by the Missouri state securities regulators and forced to pay a fine for not properly registering in the state.


Check Out Fee-Only Advising - A Higher Fiduciary Standard


Be careful with whom you trust your money. The person you are trusting to provide financial or investment advice may not be acting in your best interest. A fee-only financial advisor is a great way to go if you are seeking out advisors free of conflicts of interest. These advisors are only paid an agreed upon fee and do not receive commissions from sales of other products. You can find fee-only advisors in your area by using NAPFA's advisor search tool.


Better yet, invest in yourself and sign up for my class to learn what it takes to manage your own investments. Even if you still feel like you need a financial advisor, my class also teaches questions you can ask financial advisors to ensure they are acting in your best interest.


 
 
 

4 Comments


terrygr.a.y.78.4.41
Sep 11

https://thoitiethomnay.org/ ừ thì mình cũng hơi lăn tăn không biết có đáng mở ra coi cho nhanh không, nhưng bấm thử thấy cũng ổn phết. Vừa vào là nó hiện ngay nhiệt độ hiện tại kèm “cảm giác như” nên khỏi phải đoán già đoán non hôm nay nóng thật hay chỉ nắng nhìn cho vui; mình thấy có lúc nó để 30°C rồi cảm giác như cao hơn, nhìn phát hiểu liền. Mình hay coi theo tỉnh/thành nên cái chỗ chọn địa danh đặt dễ thấy, chuyển qua lại mượt, không phải mò menu vòng vèo. Có cái mình thích là số liệu cập nhật trong ngày, sáng xem một lần chiều quay lại vẫn thấy thay đổi chứ…

Like

elsiebre.we.r1.6.921
Sep 05

rr88 nhìn trên trang chủ là thấy họ làm bố cục khá gọn, kiểu các khối nội dung chia ra rõ ràng nên mình lướt một mạch vẫn nắm được đang nói đoạn nào; mình vốn hay khó chịu với trang nào nhét chữ dày đặc mà chỗ này đỡ hơn, kéo xuống cũng không bị đứt mạch, nhìn vẫn “ngay hàng thẳng lối” nên dễ theo dõi; có đoạn họ nhắc nền tảng vào thị trường từ 2018 và đặt trụ sở ở Philippines, mình đọc qua thấy ghi cụ thể vậy nên cảm giác thông tin có căn cứ hơn là kiểu nói chung chung; menu với mấy tiêu đề của các box trên trang chủ đặt khá…

Like

billy24barne.s7.8.3.5
Aug 27

keonhacai.cam hôm trước mình thấy bạn bè nhắc nên bấm vào coi thử cho biết, kiểu tò mò giao diện thôi chứ không ngồi đọc kỹ hay làm gì. Vào cái là thấy trang trình bày khá “dễ thở”, khoảng trắng vừa đủ nên nhìn không rối mắt. Mình để ý họ chia nội dung theo từng khối rõ ràng, nhìn lướt phát là biết phần nào nằm chỗ nào, khỏi phải mò. Thanh menu cũng để ngay chỗ dễ thấy nên chuyển qua lại nhanh, không cần bấm vòng vòng. Nói chung mình chỉ lướt vài phút mà quen tay khá nhanh, nhất là cách họ canh cột và gom thông tin thành các block gọn gàng trên trang.

Like

billy24barne.s7.8.3.5
Aug 07

Mình chơi kiểu giải trí là chính nên không quá áp lực chuyện trúng hay trượt, nhưng vẫn tò mò muốn biết vì sao có dãy số cứ xuất hiện đều, có dãy lại im hơi lặng tiếng mãi. Hồi trước mình chọn theo cảm giác, thấy số nào “hợp mắt” thì chốt, rồi sau đó lại ngồi thắc mắc sao lúc đó mình nghĩ vậy. Từ khi chịu khó theo dõi Thống kê đặc biệt tuần thì mình bắt đầu ghi lại vài cặp hay gặp, rồi đối chiếu thêm nhịp cầu với tần suất xem có khớp không. Có bữa dữ liệu trùng với linh cảm làm mình yên tâm hơn, nhưng cũng có lúc lệch hẳn, nhắc…

Like
bottom of page